These are horror films, I hope you do mind? … these sordid genres? (btw don’t get depressed and take lsd, whatever the mind has once seen, can then be used as fertile building material), how do you feel about something like “irreversible”? a film too wearing on the soul imo to be classed as entertainment? The element of its thats most grating is the sense of moral repugnance generated by the film, theres another film i saw recently that i genuinely wish that i hadn’t due to just raw moral repugnance it generated, luckily I’ve managed to forget its name as i wouldn’t wish the viewing of it, to anyone.

SUM OF US CAMPAIGN against the sun newspaper: re defending channel 4 Muslim news presenter Fatima Manji’s apparent right to rub her faith in our faces through the TV.

Your hating the messenger, isn’t in fact Islam the religion, letting us down by trying to claim when people kill, shouting allahu Akbar they are not however limitedly –  a definite part of Islam? To think otherwise is stockhausen double think. Other religions do not generate the kind of terror Islam does? Of course there are moderate Muslims and some of them good journalists, but having a Muslim presenter wearing a hijab reporting on Islamic terrorism conducted against western civilisation on channel 4 in UK, could be perceived as pretty insensitive. It is not going to go down well with the general populations already established view of lib left media bias? It personally makes me culturally feel like I’m watching Iranian television, there are plenty of people to employ in such roles, her selection however meritorious, will be perceived to be fulfilling some Lib left positive discrimination law and that might well be so. And let’s be honest since there are no doubt many candidates employing a Muslim who wears a hijab is going to be perceived as virtue signalling at the expense of any visual appeal to a wider British cultural audience other than a minority urban lib left elite.

Wearing a hijab or a burqa is the equivalent of wearing a massive gaudy cross round you neck as a Christian? We need more separation in Britain of religion and state in this once historically Christian country, not less. If flight attendents are not allowed to wear a tiny Christian cross of a necklace as a statement of faith, why on earth would a Muslim be allowed to wear a full hijab to present the news? The whole issue is disgustingly biased and idiotic cultural nose rubbing of others religious belief, which should be a private matter, the hijab and the burqa are nothing more than huge public declarative placards of your faith, and I don’t wish to see such religious symbols presenting the mainstream news in this culture, in Islamic countries it’s fine. Anymore than I would like to see all Christian women dressed in a nuns habit presenting the news, religious equality legislation will ruin Britain fully at the rate we’re going, all religions are equally stupid, but they are not equal in their output of insane violent people by any means.

since 1982 we have never had less than 200,000 people immigrating into the UK per annum
since 2002 we have never had less than 500,000 people immigrating into the UK per annum

This is unprecedented in british history.

when Enoch Powell wrote his river of blood speech he was worried about the importation of 100,000 asians into Britain in a single year.

The whip hand has been handed by liberals and the media to shit on the native poor who have never been keen on immigration.

basically hanna yusuf requested that british natives who are not keen on enforced multiculturalism mass immigratation best fuck off from britain? as though the liberal fosterance and imposition of multi culturalism and mass immigration was an absolute that is unquestionable and done – this request was not published in a private blog like this, NO it was promoted by a national newspaper – the independent who it seems are not free from liberal dogma. What immigrants especially 2nd or 3rd generation dont realise is that the lower classes never gave their democratic consent to being replaced by the pet feudal imported fosterances of the minority power liberal classes whom are the main group of traitors who approve of them. Immigrants understand your presence here has never been agreed to by the struggling native. so if you come up against those who do not desire your presence, do not for one second inagine they are going to leave or that you can avoid theyre steely gaze – if you dont like the fact you are going to have to live amongst those who are never going to be keen on your presence, if you dont like that? well as as you would put it hanna , I suggest you leave for your truly native lands where you are welcome.

here’s a comment by a leftists individual re trump

looking at this pic he reminds me of a fish feeding with those lips!!!

a reduction-ism re trump if there ever was one, they’re not really interested in investigating and comprehending why people might support trump ?

Here is my response from a moderated centrist perspective:

if ‘any’ of the other candidates had a strong policy re: mass immigration and talked honestly and boldly about it, and the importation of people who are bringing in primitive belief systems in their ideological baggage, many of whom, are against western value systems and would hold their belief ahead of their national identity, Trump would have little traction in the US. His appeal lies with lower to middle class America, which due to divisive identity and entitlement politics and a weak economy, has is in fact been polarizing people against each other in the US, this problem has largely been ignored in the USA for 50 years, this community is no longer happy about what the government is doing in its name, subscribing to the tenets of the USA is no longer required which is weakening cultural unity, this is in fact a global problem,

it can to some extent be reduced down to be a virtue signalling war between the idea of integrative homogeneous cultures and multicultural segregative cultures operating within the territory of pre-existing defined nation states.

. whether they be founded in their current form on mass immigration such as AUS, NZ, USA etc or not.

Theres seems to me something so empire and BBC archaic about Stacey Dooley investigates, isn’t there ?

Like some great white ginger topped urchin East London china Doll, swooping in to empathise with the developing world and poor people everywhere, to me it feels so empire based from a mindset perspective and largely patronising, it’s amazing she’s has the ability to lecture full grown foreign people wherever she goes on the rights and wrongs of everything, and to feel morally outraged on everyone’s behalf. When the real elephant in the room, is her own incredulity and disbelief at what situations poverty will drive people to, there’s a kind of almost unbelievable stupidity displayed, as though she is shocked the entire worlds population doesn’t operate from a similar middle class, profligately paid media privilege liberal perspective as herself.

Ready to throw her yes of course it’s us white peoples fault at any turn round any short of stature desperate foreign person who will awkwardly fit under and accept it on camera, and then she proceeds to lecture everyone foreign as to the right or wrongs of every situation in every foreign culture she knows little about. And then once she’s done her bit, she swans off to the next place where she can be shocked, where people suffering can be temporarily highlighted for TV entertainment purposes.
I’m sure she’s one of the BBC’s ‘next generation’, she almost ticks all the right boxes, young, urban, female, mockney lower class pretensions and accent, just immigrant parents are missing. I can see her in a few years time, a wealthy, hyper liberal, London media type, owning a large Georgian terrace house with a couple of London privileged liberal spawn and a media hubby, being a mainstay of BBC liberal white guilt propaganda, swanning from one media hyped charity event to another promoting the plight of everything ethnic foreign and minority ahead of anything native. 

Like a kind of new wave lumley without the familial tie to the ghurkas, having  in the few preceding years lost the nose, stomach and nerve for stepping into the common white native persons home or understanding any fragment of the idea that the BBC should represent the native electorate of the Isle that it’s title contains.

Sooner or later if I even did watch the Beeb, the only non ideological dogma free output, I could watch might be the nature programs, but even their credits would highlight an overt employment policy, founded on something other than merit.

No doubt her research team are cooking up where Stacey can investigate next ? I’m sure under priviliged foreign people everywhere can’t wait to be told how they should exist and operate, and what’s unjust and what they’re getting wrong in their lives, culture and society by her, and how white english 20 year old empathetic mockney girls, have all the answers – to those obvious situations caused by poverty, that they just can’t see and rectify such obvious lack of money based injustices themselves, in the pursuit of mirroring a southern middle class, UK take on everything.

These programs rarely seem to go back so many years down the line , and if they did all they’d would probably do, is falsely ‘appropriate’ the glory and credit of the native gumption demonstrated in the long Intervening years.

People who can’t afford their own homes cant afford £5.35 per week in order to comment – thats feudalism, so dont expect your website to be full of anything but the thoughts of a wealthy minority.

The buy to let feudal philosophy is harmful for societal cohesion and balance, if Osborne’s measure doesn’t drastically reduce buy to let, we need ‘more extreme’ measures to tax multiple house owners and landlords, oh landlords you’ll just up your rents will you? this assumes you’ll find people who have no choice but to pay it, for a roof over their head, and pay the new costs for you, how convenient to have some serf to pass the financial buck to? I would advise all young people to move to the only affordable areas left in the UK and spend their life energy in such places where homes are more affordable otherwise you’ll be renting from these scum when your over 40, Let the buy to letters have their fiscal home ownership apartheid until no new serf renters are found, try never to pay anyones mortgage if you can help it, but don’t become a giganto mortgage slave either. The system is rotten it needs correcting one way or another.

Wondrous Obsessions: The Cabinet of Curiosities

Presenter appears to be a foreign student who never returned “home” – no doubt wrote a few papers, on nothing of much relevance as most academia seems bent these days and has got a professorship in said flannel subject, from some soft liberal university and now it seems has a TV career talking in the most stilted and mannered version of an affected posh english accent. Hmm bearable just – if one tunes out the accent. Little novel or precise is divulged, felt like an ill focused magazine show about the age of collecting in the the 17th century, didn’t feel I learnt much by the time it was over, the educative content of such shows needs to go up. The program itself displayed parallels to the last fake curio exhibition it discussed, where people deliberately blur the line between entertaining piffle and truth conveying signal, I did not come away enlightened and it rang a little perhaps, as though a slight of televisual story telling had been washed over me, leaving me uncaring for the merit of the programs existence or not. Certainly compared to many other great documentaries one could spend ones time viewing. Not quite true … a few things were learnt re Ashmoles connived control of the Tredescant collection which rings true, and Tredescants role of the no doubt ass-kissing kings gardener giving you enough wealth and access to acquire such a collection. Im sure the post is still as comfortable and well paid.

cabinet of curiosities

I worked out the other day using an ebay calculator

that in total for a £400 Buy it now item – in total with insertion fees, final value fees and paypal fees –

ebay are taking in total around 20% of the purchase cost of the item in charges

. and that includes taking fees on the cost of your postage whatever that may cost you – in my case £20 for the particular item, they even charge compound paypal fees on the proportion of money you receive that they will end up taking off you in charges for the auction ? whichever way you look at it ebay is a rip-off, why because thats more expensive in total than selling through a physical auction which normally charges 15% to the seller and alot less for vehicles? a web service like ebay should be around the 10% of purchase level of cost at maximum, otherwise its less cost effective than a physical auction? we should all have an ebay strike where we stop listing stuff for a week in the year, otherwise ebay will never listen.